McDonald’s statement and subsequent public testimony had led Mr. Keel, its executive director, said in an interview, adding that Mr. “It was the turning point of the commission,” Alton G. Rogers immediately asked for the room to be emptied so that the commissioners could discuss Mr. Mulloy was not giving them the whole story the engineers, he said, had been pressured and overruled. His hands shaking, he told the panel that Mr. McDonald, sitting in the back of the room, stood up. Mulloy conceded that there had been a discussion, but said that the company had ultimately agreed to go ahead.Īt that point Mr. Mulloy, who oversaw the booster rockets for NASA, about rumors of a dissent by Morton Thiokol engineers. “Normally we were always challenged to prove it was safe to launch,” he said in a recent Netflix documentary, “Challenger: The Final Flight.” “Now all of a sudden we got the impression they were asking us to prove it would fail, and we couldn’t do that.”ĭuring the hearing, Ms. McDonald actually prove the rings would fail? And why was he bringing up his opposition now, just hours before the flight? And even if the takeoff was successful, choppy conditions in the Atlantic Ocean might make recovering the reusable rockets impossible. Not only might the O-rings fail, he said, but ice hanging from the launch tower could fall off and damage the shuttle’s heat shield. McDonald continued to press the case in Florida. While the Ogden team took a break to discuss their objections, Mr. 27, they refused to sign off on the launch - a necessary step in the shuttle’s safety protocol. During a conference call with NASA officials late on the evening of Jan. McDonald’s engineering team at the Morton Thiokol rocket plant in Utah, including Mr. The temperature on the night before the Challenger launch was expected to drop to 18 degrees. It wasn’t a new concern: Another Morton Thiokol engineer, Roger Boisjoly, had outlined the problem in a July 1985 memo, drawing on evidence of O-ring stiffening from a previous launch, when the temperature was 53 degrees Fahrenheit.
#CHALLENGER SPACE SHUTTLE DISASTER O RING SERIES#
The shuttle’s rockets contained a series of rubber O-ring gaskets, and he worried that low temperatures could cause them to stiffen, allowing fuel to escape and potentially causing the rocket to explode. McDonald, who ran the company’s booster-rocket program, had strong reservations about moving ahead with the launch. President Ronald Reagan was planning to mark that milestone in his State of the Union address, coincidentally scheduled for the same day as the launch.īut Mr. The mission was to be the first to carry a civilian into space, a teacher named Christa McAuliffe. McDonald was a 26-year veteran at Morton Thiokol, the contractor responsible for the shuttle’s booster rockets, when he arrived at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida a few days before Jan.
The cause was complications of a recent fall, his daughter Meghan McDonald Goggin said. McDonald, an engineer who on a chilly January morning in 1986 tried to stop the launch of the Challenger space shuttle, citing the possible effect of the cold on its booster rockets, and who, after it broke apart on liftoff, blew the whistle when government officials tried to cover up his dissent, died on Saturday in Ogden, Utah. This shows that an O-ring failure was sure to happen when the launch temperature was that cold (31☏).Allan J. This gives the estimated model for \(\pi_i\) as \[ (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1 ) Null deviance: chall.glm 0 ~ temp, data=Challeng, family=binomial) The estimates of the coefficients \(\beta_0\) and \(\beta_1\) for the above logistic regression model and data are shown below. The “temp” column lists the outside temperature at the time of launch. The “fail” column in the data set below records how many O-rings experienced failures during that particular launch. In the following analysis we demonstrate more fully how dangerous it was to launch on this specific day where the outside temperature at the time of the launch was 31°. The “evidence” that the o-rings could fail below 53° was based on a simple conclusion that since the launch at 53° experienced two o-ring failures, it seemed unwise to launch below that temperature. Engineers prior to the Challenger launch suggested that the launch not be attempted below 53°. This is evident in the data set shown below. The lowest temperature of any of the 23 prior launches (before the Challenger explosion) was 53° F 2. The main concern of engineers in launching the Challenger was the evidence that the large O-rings sealing the several sections of the boosters could fail in cold temperatures.
0 kommentar(er)
